Jun 16, 2014 · Dan Munro Contributor

National, not-for-profit, membership organization dedicated to improving healthcare through the collection, analysis, dissemination, public availability, and use of health data.

can also be seen in the public's views on healthcare costs and quality
Photo provided by Flickr

This interactive website provides a tool that is designed to help public health organizations create an implementation plan to increase opportunities for improving population health. Free registration is required to use the system.

I write about the intersection of healthcare innovation and policy

A newly-announced plan by three of the most prominent billionaires in the U.S. to "disrupt" the American health insurance industry was met with extreme skepticism from advocates of a government-run healthcare system on Tuesday.. healthcare doesn't need to be "disrupted." it needs to be provided to all people, free of charge. this framing still treats healthcare as if it's …
Photo provided by Flickr

I know so many people who are suffering, not only health-wise, but also in other aspects of their lives due to the distorted US healthcare system. I know women who stay in miserable marriages because they need the health insurance for chronic health conditions, people deeply in debt after surgeries that were not fully covered by their insurance, people with insurance who don’t even use it because they don’t have enough cash to meet the $2000 deductible. How is that better than everyone pitching in for the health of the nation? In actually having some freedom to make a life for yourself without always worrying, “What if I get sick?”

have consequences for the health care system.

Something akin to what is mentioned is the only realistic option for the US. Our population is to large to have a single payor system. The key is to cap prices on health services so that costs are contained. Regardless of what the opinions on this issue are. We have to fix healthcare in this country or we will become bankrupt.

'Socialized' or not, Britain's health care system is ..

Dr. Reinhardt has provided an informative article about various versions of a medical care financing system. Unfortunately, there is no discussion about patient care, and specifically assuring that patient outcome is a significant metric for reimbursement of healthcare providers. The current business model rewards the providers in proportion to the expense of procedures, tests, medicines, etc., as long as they’re covered by applicable insurance. Dr. Reinhardt correctly states that patients demand this type of care; and no wonder – the medical industry has been marketing it heavily for years. For medical care reform to be economically sustainable, and also beneficial to the entire population, two versions are apparent. First would be a basic level of care for everyone that covers limited examinations, tests, generic medicines, and hospital care when approved by an impartial medical provider. For those indiviuals that desire more than this and are willing and able to pay for it, they should be able to purchase appropriate private insurance or self-finance. This would be analogous to the public and private education system that most people consider satisfactory.

the media or the American public

This report uses recent data to compare health care system performance in the U.S. with that of 10 other high-income countries and considers the different approaches to health care organization and delivery that can contribute to top performance. We based our analysis on 72 indicators that measure performance in five domains important to policymakers, providers, patients, and the public: Care Process, Access, Administrative Efficiency, Equity, and Health Care Outcomes.