In the case of a utilitarian perspective, a person may chooseto live for the good of others. For the sake of loved ones andthe pain they might feel because of death, or because of the premiumthat society places on life, a person may choose to go on livingeven though they might make an individual choice to die if suchconsiderations did not exist. By the same token, a utilitarianperspective may lead a person to choose death. The pain and financialburdens that family members or society might have to endure couldbe so great that although the person might want to go on living,it would be in the best interest of the family or of society thatthe individual should choose to die.

If death is not a bad thing then many of the objections to euthanasia vanish.

Some of the leadership of the National Hospice & Palliative Care Organization is composed of pro-euthanasia advocates like Mary Labyak, CEO of the Hospice of the Florida Suncoast. Why would this organization elect her or others like her to such prominent positions if the organization cared about promoting the sanctity of life? They don't. They are absolutely promoting a secular, utilitarian "progressive" vision that includes hastening death through the misuse of terminal sedation. Whether they admit it or not matters not. What matters is the direction they are steering health care and end-of-life care in particular.

Euthanasia | Definition of Euthanasia by Merriam-Webster

The word “euthanasia” itself comes from the Greek words “eu” (good) and “thanatos” (death).

We can be sure that there will be increasingly agitated declarations that legalization of euthanasia is "absolutely necessary." And at the same time, almost nothing will be done about the billions and billions of dollars somehow "disappearing" into the pockets of hundreds of nameless beneficiaries of the government's largess and the U.S. Justice Department's failure to go after those plundering the national treasury through fraud of all sorts. Several factors are simultaneously impacting our society that will push toward imposing death upon the vulnerable. And many people will believe the lie.

Non-Religious Arguments against 'Voluntary Euthanasia'

Recommendations from health care professionals who are in your family or from those you trust can be very valuable, but again, they are no guarantee. Do these health care professionals share your values about how care should be provided? Do they value the sanctity of life or do they think it is "ok" to end life (one way or another) to relieve suffering? Do they believe in quality of life as the main determinant of whether a life has value? Someone who thinks quality of life is the main factor to consider may rate a hospice very highly even though they hastened a patient to an early death. If you get a recommendation from someone who recognizes the sanctity of life, that would be a good sign.

euthanasia - Free Essays, Term Papers, Research Paper, …

Aborting a baby in the womb, medically killing a patient through euthanasia, "assisting" a patient to commit suicide by providing a lethal drug? Medical killing is medical killing, technicalities apart. A human life is just that, something to be respected, nurtured and shared, not killed. Yet, those intent on killing keep on keeping on. They have never stopped pushing their agenda. Philip Nitschke, MD, Australia's "Doctor Death" has said,

The Ethics of Euthanasia - Level 0 Quantonics

My own mother-in-law was neglected and malnourished, even emaciated. My wife and I took her into our home when she was visiting and cared for her, made sure she ate and bathed and got all her medications. She had not been getting her B-12 injections for pernicious anemia nor had she gotten her medications for high blood pressure where she had been living. It was a miracle she was still alive. But once we had her here, she gained about 30 pounds and was at her optimum weight and health, even though the family had told us she had "failure to thrive" and "could not gain" weight. All she needed was decent food, common medications and loving care. If she had remained where she was, she would very likely have been sent to hospice, continued to be deprived of the simple blood pressure medications she needed and her B-12 injections, and died at least three years earlier. She lived another few years with us till she died a natural death. And yes, a good hospice was involved, then, at the end.

Quantumly - quanton(death,life) equals life itself

Manipulation of patients and families occurs by mixing some things that may be true at the wrong timing or with the wrong patient. This intentional manipulation results in hastened deaths, and there are many, many deceptions we have heard about through the years. Only an experienced hospice physician or nurse would be able to know that the professional-sounding advice was not appropriate at that time or for that particular patient. Similar deceptions happen in an acute hospital setting when the patient has been selected for stealth euthanasia. Certain patients are denied treatment, forced to sign a DNR order, and manipulated into hospice; the pattern is becoming more and more common.