Psych Ch. 10 Flashcards | Quizlet

But several objections have been raised against life satisfactionviews. The most common complaint has already been noted, namely that aperson could apparently be satisfied with her life even while leadinga highly unpleasant or emotionally distressed existence, and it canseem counterintuitive to regard such a person as happy (see section2.2). Some life satisfaction theorists deny that such cases arepossible (Benditt 1978), but it could also be argued that suchpossibilities are part and parcel of life satisfaction's appeal:some people may not get much pleasure out of life because theydon't care particularly about affective matters, and a lifesatisfaction theory allows that they can, in their own fashion, behappy.

The motivation for this paper is to determine overall satisfaction with life in society today

In this study the authors measured perceived professional and personal life satisfaction of Workplace Specialist I (WS I) faculty and their mentors. WS I faculty were all first-year career and technical education (CTE) faculty who must have completed the WS I training program to be eligible for the Workplace Specialist II teaching license. WS I faculty were assigned mentors during their first year of training. Mentors were experienced CTE K-12 faculty with at least five years of teaching experience.

Below are seven areas to improve employee satisfaction

It is proposed that overall life satisfaction comes from within an individual based on the individual's personal values and what he ..

Were you to survey public attitudes about the value of happiness, atleast in liberal Western democracies, you would likely findconsiderable support for the proposition that happiness is all that reallymatters for human well-being. Many philosophers over the ages havelikewise endorsed such a view, typically assuming a hedonistic accountof happiness. (A few, like Almeder 2000, have identified well-beingwith happiness understood as life satisfaction.)

December 2013 Monitor on Psychology

Philosophers have most commonly distinguished two accounts ofhappiness: hedonism, and the life satisfactiontheory. Hedonists identify happiness with the individual'sbalance of pleasant over unpleasant experience, in the same way thatwelfare hedonists do.[]Thedifference is that the hedonist about happiness need not accept thestronger doctrine of welfare hedonism; this emerges clearly inarguments against the classical Utilitarian focus on happiness as theaim of social choice. Such arguments tend to grant theidentification of happiness with pleasure, but challenge the idea thatthis should be our primary or sole concern, and often as well the ideathat happiness is all that matters for well-being.

Home | Local Government Association

The purpose of this study was to use participants’ survey data to determine perceived satisfaction with life experiences. Overall, life satisfaction was determined by using the Life Satisfaction Index for the Third Age (LSITA) that focused on perceived life satisfaction (see Appendix A).

Personal Research Blog | One DBA students journey

Why should anyone care to press such a distinction in characterizinghappiness? For most people, the hedonic difference between happiness onan emotional state versus a hedonistic view is probably minimal. Butwhile little will be lost, what will be gained? One possibility is thatthe more “central” affects involving our emotionalconditions may bear a special relation to the person or theself, whereas more “peripheral” affects, like thepleasantness of eating a cracker, might pertain to the subpersonalaspects of our psychologies. Since well-being is commonly linked toideas of self-fulfillment, this sort of distinction might signal adifference in the importance of these states. Another reason to focuson emotional condition rather than experience alone may be the greaterpsychological depth of the former: its impact on our mental lives,physiology, and behavior is arguably deeper and more pervasive. Thisenhances the explanatory and predictive significance of happiness, andmore importantly its desirability: happiness on this view is notmerely pleasant, but a major source of pleasure and other goodoutcomes (Fredrickson 2004, Lyubomirsky, King et al. 2005).Compare health on this score: while many think it matters chiefly orentirely because of its connection with pleasure, there are fewskeptics about the importance of health. As well, emotional stateviews may capture the idea that happiness concerns the individual'spsychological orientation or disposition: to be happy, on anemotional state theory, is not just to be subjected to a certainsequence of experiences, but for one's very being to manifest afavorable orientation toward the conditions of one's life—a kindof psychic affirmation of one's life. This reflects a point ofsimilarity with life satisfaction views of happiness: contra hedonism,both views take happiness to be substantially dispositional, involvingsome sort of favorable orientation toward one's life. But lifesatisfaction views tend to emphasize reflective or rationalendorsement, whereas emotional state views emphasize the verdicts ofour emotional natures.